Friday, October 7, 2022
HomeNewsMan found in woodchipper had a 'safety first' at work approach, court...

Man found in woodchipper had a ‘safety first’ at work approach, court hears


As a butcher, Bruce Saunders had a “security first” method at work earlier than his physique was present in a woodchipper, a court has heard.
Sharon Graham, 61, and Gregory Lee Roser, 63, have pleaded not responsible to murder after Saunders, 54, died whereas engaged on a property north of Brisbane in November 2017.

Graham is accused of asking Roser and one other man, Peter Koenig, to kill Saunders and make it appear to be an accident to assert her ex-partner’s $750,000 life insurance coverage coverage.

Sharon Graham, 61, and Gregory Lee Roser, 63, pleaded not guilty to the murder of Bruce Saunders in Brisbane.
Sharon Graham, 61, and Gregory Lee Roser, 63, pleaded not responsible to the homicide of Bruce Saunders in Brisbane. (Provided)

The jury has been proven photos and police video of Saunders’ legs protruding from the chipper on the Goomboorian property close to Gympie after he had been clearing bushes with Roser and Koenig.

Roser and Koenig advised the property’s proprietor after the tragedy that Saunders had been an “absolute fool on the day” and had been standing on the chipper, leaning again into it, the Brisbane Supreme Court docket has heard.

Graham’s good friend Leonie Whyte additionally earlier advised the jury that Koenig and Roser stated Saunders’ loss of life was an accident after he had been “messing round” with equipment and “wasn’t being very cautious”.

Nevertheless, work colleagues on Friday stated Saunders was security aware, at all times wore protecting gear and was cautious round band saws as a butcher.

“He was good, at all times wore his mesh glove, security was at all times first with him,” Joseph Sciberas advised the jury.

Fellow butcher Ross Mills advised the courtroom that Saunders would positively not act recklessly on the office.

“He was very tidy, not clumsy, actually cautious working with the band noticed,” he stated.

Sharon Graham, 61, and Bruce Saunders, 54, whose body was found in a woodchipper in Brisbane in 2017.
Sharon Graham, 61, and Bruce Saunders, 54, whose physique was present in a woodchipper in Brisbane in 2017. (Provided)

Graham has been accused of being in a “love quadrangle” with Roser, Koenig and Saunders, plotting the latter’s homicide for months.

Sciberas advised the courtroom that Saunders stated Graham had left him for one more man however later returned “like nothing had occurred” to his Nambour residence to reside in a separate bed room.

Graham had advised Saunders “to exit and get one other lady, she did not wish to be in a relationship anymore”, one other work colleague Mark Bridger advised the courtroom.

However throughout what turned his last shifts Saunders advised Bridger that he had purchased a caravan and constructed an extension to his Nambour home as a result of Graham wished it.

He stated Saunders advised him he had “refinanced issues to make it occur so she was completely happy”.

Bridger stated Saunders did not know the place Graham went on weekends however thought she was visiting her ex-husband, nevertheless “could not show it”.

Saunders additionally typically stated that he “wished to supply every thing for her however she wished nothing to do with him” and that Graham had blocked him on Fb, Bridger advised the jury.

Bruce Saunders was murdered and put in a woodchipper in Gympie, Queensland.
The jury noticed photos of Bruce Saunders’ legs protruding from the chipper on the Goomboorian property close to Gympie (Provided)

In the meantime, Justice Martin Burns dismissed an software for a mistrial by Graham’s barrister Peter Richards after proof from Saunders’ good friend Demelsa Watts on Friday.

Watts stated Saunders had advised her in a cellphone dialog that Graham knew “some unsavoury folks in case you ever want somebody knocked off”.

She stated Saunders laughed after she advised him to “watch out, it might occur to him”, the courtroom heard.

“When assessing that kind of proof the assertion stated to have been made to Ms Watts was clearly not beneath oath, it was a phone dialog,” Burns advised the jury.

“What Mr Saunders advised Ms Watts … is untested and untestable as a result of Mr Saunders sadly after all cannot be examined to establish its reliability.

“I warn you that that you must train warning in deciding whether or not to simply accept it’s dependable.”



Source link

RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisment -

Most Popular

Recent Comments

x